[Smoke & Mirrors]

How do you attempt to keep the 'narrative' in play [control the 'sheep']?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-launch-impeachment-investigation-with-bid-for-grand-jury-info-insist-mueller-delivered

Key sentence:

Nadler called the grand jury materials �critically important� for their investigation.

Does Nadler understand that the 'critically important' material requested would be illegal for AG Barr to disclose?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/04/mueller-report-attorney-general-grand-jury-information/

"This means Attorney General Barr must redact grand-jury material from the Mueller report before disclosing it to Congress. Democrats will complain long and loud about this, but I don�t see how Barr can be reasonably faulted for following the law. Congress, after all, has the power to legislate an amendment to Rule 6(e) that would permit disclosure of grand-jury materials from a special counsel investigation to appropriate congressional committees."

Will members of the D party Congress attempt to amend Rule 6(e) in order to obtain grand jury material deemed 'critically important'?

No?

Logical thinking, why?

Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument?

People elected 'knowingly' spreading false-information [disinformation]?

Puppets follow orders.

Think for yourself.

Q