News:

"Put an end once and for all to this discussion of what a good man should be, and be one." Marcus Aurelius


Main Menu

Q Drop #2776

Started by RSS Bot, Sat Jan 07, 2023 - 07:15:21

Previous topic Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RSS Bot

Q Drop #2776

Barr to Mueller:

�Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.�

Mueller to Bart:

�With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc�

Barr to Mueller:

�Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.� �What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?�

Mueller to Barr:

�Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.�

Barr to Mueller:

�Was the Steele report a �trusted and verified� report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?�

Mueller to Barr:

�Those facts were never taken into consideration.� �FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.�

Barr to Mueller:

�Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?�

Mueller to Barr:

�No.� �We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.�

Barr to Mueller:

�Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?� �Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?�

�All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?�

Barr to RR:

�What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?� �What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?� �Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?� �Why wasn�t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?� �Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?� �Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?�

CLAS 1-99

Q

Source: Q Drop #2776

Tags:

Share via facebook Share via linkedin Share via pinterest Share via telegram Share via twitter